November 2023

One of these Names is Not Like the Others! One of these Names Doesn’t Belong!

nostalgia, retro, vintage-6623238.jpg

So and So begat What’s His Name

The first time I ever heard a genealogy from the Bible was in grade school. “And So and So begot What’s His Name and What’s His name begot Who’s It,” read my grandpa Donaldson without batting an eye. My family laughed except for Grandma Erma. She was not amused by what she deemed irreverent.

I know a few people who get excited about genealogies, like my mom; usually, these people are genealogists. Only brave souls study and compile a family genealogy. When they do, it’s typically personal for their family.

tree, family, education-1951473.jpg

The Apostal Matthew, however, recorded the genealogy of Jesus. Luke also took on this task from a different side of the family. While these are the only two genealogies in the New Testament, lists of who begat who saturate the Old Testament. But in the genealogies of the Bible, Matthew’s is unique.

Some argue the genealogy in Matthew is unique because it mentions women. The Old Testament genealogies rarely mentioned women. However, the patens of Israel’s kings all include women. Matthew’s Gospel establishes Jesus’ legal claim to David’s throne and exalts Him as the King of Kings. A Jewish reader would expect to see some of their queens listed. So, mentioning four women by name is not an anomaly; however, one character is. Uriah!

sheep, graze, black sheep-4152632.jpg

As I study the genealogies of Scripture, the listing of Uriah should strike us as scandalous. And it does, but not in the way the Lord intends. Our minds too quickly run to his wife, Bathsheba—but despite her blood relationship, her name is absent. The point is not that two adulterers are in the lineage of Christ. While the Lord contrasts a sinful King David with the better King David—Jesus—the sinless King of Kings, there’s more going on with the listing of Uriah.

Uriah is the only time in any Biblical genealogy that a scribe includes the name of a man who is not a relative. If God just wanted to remind us of David’s sin, He could have said, “And David begot Solomon by means of adultery.” But God mentions the name of the victim of this crime, Uriah. When we consider Uriah’s story, we discover two essential truths of the Gospel. First, Uriah exemplifies loyalty to King David. Second, Uriah the Hittite—like the three women mentioned before him—is a Gentile. God vindicated Uriah’s devotion to the King of the Jews by including him in the genealogy of the Messiah. Uriah’s inclusion reminds us Jesus was born to build a kingdom from every tribe, tongue, and nation. Jesus is not just the King of the Jews like David was. Jesus honors and welcomes every person who pledges allegiance to Him as Uriah pledged allegiance to David.

knight, decoration, king-3066217.jpg

So, as we read Mathew’s Christmas story, slow down in the opening genealogy. Let’s savor every word of God and not insert a name that isn’t recorded. Better yet, let’s stop after reading his name and read Uriah’s story in 2 Samuel 11 – 12. This account reminds us that one man’s sin brings death to many, just as the birth and death of the Savior bring many to life.

The peace on earth Jesus brings is peace with God—the forgiveness of sin and the redemption of all the devastation our sins inflict upon others. Uriah’s name doesn’t belong in Christ’s genealogy any more than our names belong in the Book of Life. But praise God, we can hear the angels sing, “Peace on earth, goodwill to men.” And by God’s grace, our names are written down in glory too. Merry CHRISTmas!

christmas angels, holiday decorations, tree toppers-62200.jpg

Is “Yahweh” an Okay Way to Refer to God?

fantasy, light, mood-2861107.jpg

“Hollowed be Thy name.”

Deep reverence motivated ancient scribes to translate the Lord’s proper name as Lord—Adonia in Hebrew. Even when modern Messianic Jewish scholars write English translations, they often choose to translate Elohim (Genesis 1:1) G-d dropping the ‘o’ to show respect for our Creator. Consider this statement from the translators of the Tree of Life Bible Version (a Messianic Jewish translation):

Our desire to honor traditional Christian translation practices:

God’s most holy, unspeakable Name usually appears in Bibles as “Lord”, but is sometimes not recognized as especially reverenced due to the mind’s ability to disregard the use of small caps. And, sometimes translators simply add vowels to the YHVH consonants of the Hebrew Aleph-Bet and give “The Name” utterance using the “Jehovah” or Yahweh.” This can be seen as very irreverent by Jewish people who would rather use “HaShem” which literally translates as “The Name.”

Taken from page xiii of the Tree of Live Bible

Many old and modern hymns use “Jehovah” and “Yahweh.” I sang those songs without thought for most of my life in Christ. But recently—I bristle. Through the intimacy we enjoy with God through Christ, have we become too familiar with the Holy Triune One?

His Spirit dwells in us, and He is our Father; does that afford us to be on a first-name basis with the Lord, Who is life and love personified in Jesus? Do you call your biological father by his first name? I don’t. Does that make him less personal? Not at all; Dad, Daddy, Papa, and Abba are terms of endearment reserved for children in a permanently close relationship. My friends called my dad Mr. Donaldson or Dave. My cousins called him Uncle Dave. “Daddy” was reserved for me and my brother alone.

Calling the Lord Father or Abba expresses a closeness that only those He has redeemed enjoy with Him. Calling Him by His first name strikes me as irreverent. Even Jesus never did that. He always said, “my Father,” and that is how he taught us to pray.

Christ refers to Himself as our brother and the Son of God and Man. Therefore, to call our Messiah Jesus (or, more accurately, Yeshua) is appropriate. We are on a first-name basis with our siblings. Hence, “Lord” referring to Jesus is not in small caps because, though He is God, we are referencing One specific person of our Triune Lord. If God amazes and mystifies us, should our awe not be reflected in how we refer to Him?

jesus, name tag, wall ceramics-8283.jpg

You may think I’m being persnickety—but words and names matter. They’re powerful. And familiarity, as the cliché goes, breeds contempt. My growing conviction is born from an increasing reverence of the One Who is my all in all, my Creator, Sovereign, and Father. And I just can’t call Him by His first name anymore. So, if we happen to be singing in Church together and my “Adonia” interrupts your “Yahweh,” I hope you understand; I’m not judging you if you feel the freedom as I once did to sing the unspeakable Name. Freely expressing my awe by not speaking the Name liberates my heart. Together by faith, we hollow the Name of our Lord, God Almighty!